Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
(replying to myself ...)
Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I agree that it is inconsistent as-is. So a patch to make it use the
"git-repo-config" form (the argument being that internally, we use the
full names) might be good if just for consistency.
If we do the dash-form for consistency's sake,...
Probably I should add that personally my preference is to standardize on
the dashless form.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:35:22PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I agree that it is inconsistent as-is. So a patch to make it use the
"git-repo-config" form (the argument being that internally, we use the
full names) might be good if just for consistency.
If we do the dash-form for consistency's sake,...
Probably I should add that personally my preference is to standardize on
the dashless form.
That would remove the possibility to run "git-push" in my scenario. And
what is the benefit? Wasting CPU cycles to an extra execve?
Duplicating git --exec-path to PATH?
Personally I recommend to always run git helper programs with absolute
path, this would remove all confusions, not play with users' PATH
environment, and save CPU cycles.
Qingning