Re: The merge from hell...
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:18
"Brown, Len" [off-list ref] writes:
Naming the branch is just eye-candy for the merge comment. My topic branch labels in refs/my-branch never get to kernel.org, so you're not going to see the pretty green tags on topic branches branches that I see. I include the full-URL of the bug report in the original commit comments for those who are interested. I think this it the important place to put it, and in practice I've found it to be extremely useful.
Both excellent points.
If I may digress,...
It appears most of the topic branches in that merge have only
one commit since they forked from trunk (the development track
led to the first parent of that merge), but some seem to have
more than one commits.
It might make sense if we have a tool support to pre-format the
merge messages like this, given set of branch names:
[ACPI] Merge 3549, 4320, 4485, 4588, 4980, 5483, 5651, acpica, asus, fops and pnpacpi branches into release
3549: [ACPI] Disable C2/C3 for _all_ IBM R40e Laptops
4320: [ACPI] fix reboot upon suspend-to-disk
4485: [ACPI] handle BIOS with implicit C1 in _CST
4588: [ACPI] fix acpi_os_wait_sempahore() finite timeout case (AE_TIME warning)
4980 (5 commits): [ACPI] build EC driver on IA64
5483 (3 commits): [ACPI] fix acpi_cpufreq.c build warrning
5651: [ACPI] SMP S3 resume: evaluate _WAK after INIT
acpica (23 commits): [ACPI] ACPICA 20060113
asus (3 commits): [ACPI_ASUS] fix asus module param description
fops (2 commits): [ACPI] make two processor functions static
pnpacpi (3 commits): [PNPACPI] clean excluded_id_list[]
Here I am counting the number of commits on each topic since it
last diverged from trunk (`merge-base release branch`), and
showing the latest commit of the topic.
We could even go further and have "per branch annotation" that
lets you do something like this:
$ git checkout -b 3549 \
--description 'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549'
$ work work
$ git commit
... work on other topics in similar way ...
... later, on the 'release' branch ...
$ git pull . 3549 4320 4485...
With that, we could give a default merge message formatted like this:
Merge 3549, 4320, 4485, 4588, 4980, 5483, 5651, acpica, asus, fops and pnpacpi branches into release
3549: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549
[ACPI] Disable C2/C3 for _all_ IBM R40e Laptops
4320: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4320
[ACPI] fix reboot upon suspend-to-disk
5483: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5483
[ACPI] fix acpi_cpufreq.c build warrning
[ACPI] IA64 ZX1 buildfix for _PDC patch
[ACPI] Avoid BIOS inflicted crashes by evaluating _PDC only once
pnpacpi: work on PNP-ACPI issues
[PNPACPI] clean excluded_id_list[]
[PNPACPI] Ignore devices that have no resources
[ACPI] enable PNPACPI support for resource types used by HP serial ports
This last digression might be too much, though. It may be
something that is better computed by 'git log' while reviewing
history, except that the description of each branch cannot be
given that way.