Re: [ANNOUCNE] GIT 1.1.0

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [ANNOUCNE] GIT 1.1.0

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:16

lamikr [off-list ref] writes:
Did you mean that things should work after 1.1.1 is released?
I tried to fresh build and install of 1.1.0 on top of the previous
1.1.0 build but "git --version" is still displaying me "git version 1.0.GIT"
You need to build from a git repository for these automated
version numbers to work, and this will *not* change post 1.1.1.

But with the patch I sent out earlier, you should be able to:

	$ VN=1.1.1 make

in a non-git repository (e.g. an untarred directory from a
tarball).  What the patch fixes is to fix it for RPM binary
packages.

I expect that people building from the source do so from a git
repository not from a tarball, except when bootstrapping, so
hopefully this should not be too much of a problem.

Re: [ANNOUCNE] GIT 1.1.0

From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:16

Junio C Hamano wrote:
lamikr [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Did you mean that things should work after 1.1.1 is released?
I tried to fresh build and install of 1.1.0 on top of the previous
1.1.0 build but "git --version" is still displaying me "git version 1.0.GIT"
You need to build from a git repository for these automated
version numbers to work, and this will *not* change post 1.1.1.
Tarballs really should work as-is... the easy way to deal with that is 
to have the tarball make script generate a version file which isn't part 
of the git tree.

I'll send a patch under a separate cover.

	-hpa
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help