new file leaked onto release branch
From: Len Brown <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:14
I'm suspecting that this issue is technically a pilot error of me issuing git-updated-index at the wrong time, but perhaps the list should be aware of this type of issue. And perhaps somebody can suggest a better work flow that is immune to this? Somehow a new file leaked from my "acpica" branch onto my "release" branch without me pulling "acpica" into "release". I use the latest git and I follow Tony's Documentation/howto/using-topic-branches.txt. The new file, rsinfo.c, was added in one of the patches in the acpi branch, but then was sucked into the release branch in this commit: 9115a6c787596e687df03010d97fccc5e0762506 which is on the release.broken branch of this tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git Even though the file didn't exist on either of the parents of the merge. I think I probably did a git-update-index while working on the acpica branch, and then git remembered that while I was on the release branch doing a routine pull from linus to make sure I was up-to-date before doing a push to kernel.org. why did I do this? I use quilt to manage a stack of patches in my repo. I like to build them on several build machines (i386, x86_64, ia64) before doing a git commit. I package up a tar-file for the remote machines with git-tar-tree $BRANCH $REPO | gzip -1 > $TARFILE But I still need to generate a patch containing all the local changes that I haven't checked into git yet. git diff > my.patch does this for me. But when it failed to pick up a new file, I manually did a git-update-index --add IIR, and that seems to be how rsinfo.c got sucked into the subsequent git pull from linus. perhaps somebody has a better idiom for packaging up a current working tree for a remote build machine to crunch on it? thanks, -Len