Re: Expected Behavior?
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:11
Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:
Dear diary, on Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:19:06AM CET, I got a letter where Fredrik Kuivinen [off-list ref] said that...quoted
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:50:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Fredrik Kuivinen [off-list ref] writes:Oups, I haven't thought about that. I kind of like the idea that you can see the branch name in the file names though. How about replacing any slashes in the branch names with underscores? So the branch 'foo/bar' will give rise to files with suffixes like '_foo_bar' and '_foo_bar_<number>'.I like it too. :-) Now, this would look like file3~master in Cogito (or file3~~master in case of name conflict, etc.).
One thing I like about Cogito's is the use of tilde instead of underscore -- much much less likely to clash with real filenames and easiliy recognizable as throwaway copies. One thing I _don't_ like about both is there is no way for 'git reset --hard' to get rid of them, when the user decides to retry from scratch after seeing a failed merge that left too many of them.