Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 0.99.9g

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 0.99.9g

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:11

Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] writes:
... (That is, you 
want the head of an unreachable chain listed for recovery, but not other 
things reachable from it; you also may want the list of blobs and trees 
not reachable either from a ref or from something listed for recovery, but 
not omitting a blob reachable only from an unreachable tree)
I thought that was what those 'dangling blah' was about...
That is, if you make commit A and then on top of that commit B,
and lose both, you will see dnagling for B but not A (which is
reachable from B).

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 0.99.9g

From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:11

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
... (That is, you 
want the head of an unreachable chain listed for recovery, but not other 
things reachable from it; you also may want the list of blobs and trees 
not reachable either from a ref or from something listed for recovery, but 
not omitting a blob reachable only from an unreachable tree)
I thought that was what those 'dangling blah' was about...
That is, if you make commit A and then on top of that commit B,
and lose both, you will see dnagling for B but not A (which is
reachable from B).
Right; what I was pointing out is that you want the dangling commits, but 
the unreachable blobs and trees, and want reachability to count things 
listed as dangling, which is a somewhat novel combination of desires, I 
think.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help