Re: GIT 0.99.9

3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: GIT 0.99.9

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:10

A Large Angry SCM [off-list ref] writes:
It's nice to see the TODO list get shorter for a change! Especially 
since the removed TODO items are not on the HAVEDONE list.
Huh?  What are you talking about?

Most of the items that were on the TODO list and marked [DONE]
are on the HAVEDONE list, although I rephrased many of them to
be more appropriate for the release notes.  The only thing that
I did not list on HAVEDONE list was 'whatchanged -m'
documentation.  There are many documentation contributions from
the list I do not mention in HAVEDONE.

I dropped from the TODO list was the "Perhaps show ^{commit},
^{tree} instead of ^{} from ls-remote", whose benefit was
dubious.

Re: GIT 0.99.9

From: A Large Angry SCM <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:10

Junio C Hamano wrote:
A Large Angry SCM [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
It's nice to see the TODO list get shorter for a change! Especially 
since the removed TODO items are not on the HAVEDONE list.
                                    ^^^
Oops! The ``not'' wasn't supposed to be there!!!!
Huh?  What are you talking about?
My typing was in error. The ``not'' should not have been there.
Most of the items that were on the TODO list and marked [DONE]
are on the HAVEDONE list, although I rephrased many of them to
be more appropriate for the release notes.  The only thing that
I did not list on HAVEDONE list was 'whatchanged -m'
documentation.  There are many documentation contributions from
the list I do not mention in HAVEDONE.

I dropped from the TODO list was the "Perhaps show ^{commit},
^{tree} instead of ^{} from ls-remote", whose benefit was
dubious.
Junio, I think you're doing an great job with Git. Particularly, since 
I'm thinking that it may be mature enough to replace another SCM with a 
very large code base that I deal with.

Re: GIT 0.99.9

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:10

Hi,

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
Junio, I think you're doing an great job with Git.
Concur!
Particularly, since I'm thinking that it may be mature enough to replace 
another SCM with a very large code base that I deal with.
Add to that the fact that most, if not all, changes are made backwards 
compatible, i.e. git has stable for a *long* time now.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help