Re: git-diff-tree rename detection for single file

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:

See what I'm saying?
...
The performance impact of pruning the pathnames _before_ diffing them was 
absolutely staggering. You couldn't reasonably do a "git-whatchanged -p" 

Yes, I understood and agreed to that logic on May 27th.  That's
why the message you are responding said we could add a new flag,
to give the choice to the user to accept full-tree scan.

The "diff-tree --stdin that follows rename history" example
might want to have some change in either the core side of diff,
or in the rev-list.  It may help to have both.  I still haven't
thought through the issues.

BTW, I really liked your example that piped multiple diff-trees
together.  That is a neat trick.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:

BTW, I really liked your example that piped multiple diff-trees
together.  That is a neat trick.

Yeah.  Those should really be picked up to augment the documentation 
section.


Nicolas