Re: [PATCH] Added hook in git-receive-pack

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:

This looks sane. However, I also get the strong feeling that
git-update-server-info should be run as part of a hook and not be built 
into receive-pack..

Personally, I simply don't want to update any dumb server info stuff for 
my own local repositories - it's not like I'm actually serving those out 
anyway.

But you are.  I can run this just fine:

 $ git clone http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/git.git/ linus

I agree in principle that you should be able to disable the call
to update_server_info() from there, but on the other hand once
we start doing it, we need to explain people which repo is http
capable and which repo is not and why.

I was actually thinking about a call to git-update-server-info
at the end of git-repack-script.  Again, great minds think the
opposite way sometimes ;-).

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:

But you are.  I can run this just fine:

No I'm not. Try all the machines behind my firewall.

kernel.org is just the place I put things to when I publish them. It 
doesn't have any of my working directories on it.

			Linus