DORMANTno replies

[PATCH 2/2] Fix for --merge-order, --max-age interaction issue

From: Jon Seymour <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:00
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

This patch fixes a problem reported by Paul Mackerras regarding the interaction
of the --merge-order and --max-age switches of git-rev-list.

This patch applies to the current Linus HEAD. A cleaner fix for the same problem
in my current HEAD will follow later.

With this change, --merge-order produces the same result as no --merge-order
on the linux-2.6 git repository, to wit:

$> git-rev-list --max-age=1116330140 bcfff0b471a60df350338bcd727fc9b8a6aa54b2 | wc -l
655
$> git-rev-list --merge-order --max-age=1116330140 bcfff0b471a60df350338bcd727fc9b8a6aa54b2 | wc -l
655

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <redacted>


---

 rev-list.c |   14 +++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rev-list.c b/rev-list.c
--- a/rev-list.c
+++ b/rev-list.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static int max_count = -1;
 static enum cmit_fmt commit_format = CMIT_FMT_RAW;
 static int merge_order = 0;
 static int show_breaks = 0;
+static int stop_traversal = 0;
 
 static void show_commit(struct commit *commit)
 {
@@ -53,15 +54,22 @@ static void show_commit(struct commit *c
 
 static int filter_commit(struct commit * commit)
 {
+	if (merge_order && stop_traversal && commit->object.flags & BOUNDARY)
+		return STOP;
 	if (commit->object.flags & UNINTERESTING)
 		return CONTINUE;
 	if (min_age != -1 && (commit->date > min_age))
 		return CONTINUE;
-	if (max_age != -1 && (commit->date < max_age))
-		return STOP;
+	if (max_age != -1 && (commit->date < max_age)) {
+		if (!merge_order)
+			return STOP;
+		else {
+			stop_traversal = 1;
+			return CONTINUE;
+		}
+	}
 	if (max_count != -1 && !max_count--)
 		return STOP;
-
 	return DO;
 }
 
------------
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help