quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"PB" == Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:
PB> It's just something along the lines of "Me Og. Og sees /^+/. Og makes
PB> the line green." written in gawk (actually I'm not sure if pure awk
PB> wouldn't do, but I actually don't know the language), so I don't think
PB> the external diff thing would've helped me with that in any way.
Ah, I see. I thought you were talking about the Index: and
separator lines. Colorizing diff/patch part, you need to parse
the diff output with sed/awk/perl and annotate it anyway, and it
does not matter if you annotate within GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF or
outside. I agree with you that using GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF
mechanism would not help you here.
Dear diary, on Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:42:26AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] told me that...
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"PB" == Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:
PB> It's just something along the lines of "Me Og. Og sees /^+/. Og makes
PB> the line green." written in gawk (actually I'm not sure if pure awk
PB> wouldn't do, but I actually don't know the language), so I don't think
PB> the external diff thing would've helped me with that in any way.
Ah, I see. I thought you were talking about the Index: and
separator lines. Colorizing diff/patch part, you need to parse
the diff output with sed/awk/perl and annotate it anyway, and it
does not matter if you annotate within GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF or
outside. I agree with you that using GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF
mechanism would not help you here.
Well, I want to finally converge with the diff format to what git uses.
So I'm just colorizing the /^diff --git/ line with a unusually bright
color, which will hopefully make up for the Index: and separator lines.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor