Re: git-diff-files -z output
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:58
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"TG" == Thomas Glanzmann [off-list ref] writes:
TG> I am adopting to the new format.
TG> Are the fields supposed to be seperated by space or tab?
Please see Documentation/diff-format.txt; find the below in the
archive for the full description of why we wanted this format
update.
From: Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: updated design for the diff-raw format.
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 16:17:33 -0700
(second of the replayed message, with blessing from Linus)
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds [off-list ref]
To: Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Diff overhaul, adding the other half of copy detection.
Message-ID: [off-list ref]
On Sat, 21 May 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Once we start to think of it this way, it becomes quite tempting
> to change the diff-raw format to actually match the above
> concept.
I agree, and I was going to suggest changing the "raw" diff output for all
the same reasons. So I think you should do it, as the old format was based
on not really knowing where this all would take us. I think your proposed
format is visually nicer, and it's obviously more flexible.