quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"BR" == Brad Roberts [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I've merged some of the minor stuff for now.
BR> Cool, though there appears to have been some objections. :)
I do not have any problem with what the _patch_ does at all. I
had more trouble in the process of how the patch appeared in
git-pb tree, and I still do.
Please consider the revert request retracted. Request to
forewarn people in the mailing list still stands.
Dear diary, on Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:25:06PM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] told me that...
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"BR" == Brad Roberts [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
I've merged some of the minor stuff for now.
BR> Cool, though there appears to have been some objections. :)
I do not have any problem with what the _patch_ does at all. I
had more trouble in the process of how the patch appeared in
git-pb tree, and I still do.
Please consider the revert request retracted. Request to
forewarn people in the mailing list still stands.
Well, it isn't like this was some huge large-scale change; the diff is
quite small. Do you want me to announce _any_ identifier renames in
advance on the mailing list? Or where should be the threshold? These
were three renames of not-so-frequently used identifiers.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 21:48:03 +0200
From: Petr Baudis <redacted>
To: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
Cc: Brad Roberts <redacted>,
Juliusz Chroboczek [off-list ref],
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Darcs-git: a few notes for Git hackers
Dear diary, on Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:25:06PM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] told me that...quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"BR" == Brad Roberts [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
I've merged some of the minor stuff for now.
BR> Cool, though there appears to have been some objections. :)
I do not have any problem with what the _patch_ does at all. I
had more trouble in the process of how the patch appeared in
git-pb tree, and I still do.
Please consider the revert request retracted. Request to
forewarn people in the mailing list still stands.
Well, it isn't like this was some huge large-scale change; the diff is
quite small. Do you want me to announce _any_ identifier renames in
advance on the mailing list? Or where should be the threshold? These
were three renames of not-so-frequently used identifiers.
Additionally, all of these changes were posted originally on 4/22, this
was just a bring-forward of them as requested.
Later,
Brad