From: Jeff Garzik <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 11:03:12
Just updated my KHGtG to include the latest goodies available in
git-core, the Linux kernel standard SCM tool:
http://linux.yyz.us/git-howto.html
Several changes in git-core have made working with git a lot easier, so
be sure to re-familiarize yourself with the development process.
Comments, corrections, and notes of omission welcome. This document
mainly reflects my typical day-to-day git activities, and may not be
very applicable outside of kernel work.
Jeff
From: David Leimbach <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 15:18:53
On 9/29/05, Jeff Garzik [off-list ref] wrote:
Just updated my KHGtG to include the latest goodies available in
git-core, the Linux kernel standard SCM tool:
http://linux.yyz.us/git-howto.html
Can you update the date on that page to reflect your latest updates?
I was digging around with git yesterday and had a few surprises...
like checking out the kernel and being told I modified a bunch of
files I never touched.
- Dave
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Date: 2005-09-29 19:08:14
Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2005 13:03 schrieb Jeff Garzik:
Just updated my KHGtG to include the latest goodies available in
git-core, the Linux kernel standard SCM tool:
http://linux.yyz.us/git-howto.html
Several changes in git-core have made working with git a lot easier, so
be sure to re-familiarize yourself with the development process.
Comments, corrections, and notes of omission welcome. This document
mainly reflects my typical day-to-day git activities, and may not be
very applicable outside of kernel work.
Unfortunately, following the instructions to the letter produces this:
oliver@oenone:~/linux-2.6> git checkout
usage: read-tree (<sha> | -m <sha1> [<sha2> <sha3>])
Regards
Oliver
From: Jon Loeliger <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 19:35:10
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:08, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Unfortunately, following the instructions to the letter produces this:
oliver@oenone:~/linux-2.6> git checkout
usage: read-tree (<sha> | -m <sha1> [<sha2> <sha3>])
Yeah. See if you still have a .git/HEADS that symlinks
to a valid place or not...?
jdl
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Date: 2005-09-29 19:38:40
Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2005 21:34 schrieb Jon Loeliger:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:08, Oliver Neukum wrote:
quoted
Unfortunately, following the instructions to the letter produces this:
oliver@oenone:~/linux-2.6> git checkout
usage: read-tree (<sha> | -m <sha1> [<sha2> <sha3>])
Yeah. See if you still have a .git/HEADS that symlinks
to a valid place or not...?
oliver@oenone:~/linux-2.6> ls -la .git/
insgesamt 14
drwxrwxr-x 6 oliver users 224 2005-09-29 21:06 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 oliver users 72 2005-09-29 20:45 ..
-rw-rw-r-- 1 oliver users 19 2005-05-02 01:02 description
lrwxrwxrwx 1 oliver users 17 2005-09-29 21:06 HEAD -> refs/heads/master
-rw------- 1 oliver users 32 2005-09-29 21:06 index
drwxrwxr-x 2 oliver users 104 2005-09-11 21:41 info
drwxr-xr-x 260 oliver users 6240 2005-09-29 19:05 objects
drwxrwxr-x 4 oliver users 96 2005-05-02 02:15 refs
drwxr-xr-x 2 oliver users 72 2005-09-29 21:05 remotes
oliver@oenone:~/linux-2.6> ls -la .git/refs/
insgesamt 1
drwxrwxr-x 4 oliver users 96 2005-05-02 02:15 .
drwxrwxr-x 6 oliver users 224 2005-09-29 21:06 ..
drwxrwxr-x 2 oliver users 72 2005-09-29 19:05 heads
drwxrwxr-x 2 oliver users 600 2005-09-20 05:02 tags
oliver@oenone:~/linux-2.6> ls -la .git/refs/heads/
insgesamt 4
drwxrwxr-x 2 oliver users 72 2005-09-29 19:05 .
drwxrwxr-x 4 oliver users 96 2005-05-02 02:15 ..
-rw-rw-r-- 1 oliver users 41 2005-09-29 19:05 master
oliver@oenone:~/linux-2.6> cat .git/refs/heads/master
aa55a08687059aa169d10a313c41f238c2070488
Regards
Oliver
From: Dave Jones <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 20:03:21
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:03:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Just updated my KHGtG to include the latest goodies available in
> git-core, the Linux kernel standard SCM tool:
>
> http://linux.yyz.us/git-howto.html
>
> Several changes in git-core have made working with git a lot easier, so
> be sure to re-familiarize yourself with the development process.
>
> Comments, corrections, and notes of omission welcome. This document
> mainly reflects my typical day-to-day git activities, and may not be
> very applicable outside of kernel work.
You wrote..
$ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ rsync -a --verbose --stats --progress \
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/ \
.git/
Could be just..
$ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ git pull
Likewise, in the next section, git pull doesn't need an argument
if pulling from the repo it cloned.
Dave
From: Anton Altaparmakov <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 20:07:37
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:03:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Just updated my KHGtG to include the latest goodies available in
> git-core, the Linux kernel standard SCM tool:
>
> http://linux.yyz.us/git-howto.html
>
> Several changes in git-core have made working with git a lot easier, so
> be sure to re-familiarize yourself with the development process.
>
> Comments, corrections, and notes of omission welcome. This document
> mainly reflects my typical day-to-day git activities, and may not be
> very applicable outside of kernel work.
You wrote..
$ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ rsync -a --verbose --stats --progress \
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/ \
.git/
Could be just..
$ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ git pull
That is not actually the same. "git pull" for example will not download
Linus' tags whilst the rsync would get everything.
Likewise, in the next section, git pull doesn't need an argument
if pulling from the repo it cloned.
Now that is definitely correct. (-:
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
From: Dave Jones <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 20:11:45
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:07:29PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > $ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
> > $ cd linux-2.6
> > $ rsync -a --verbose --stats --progress \
> > rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/ \
> > .git/
> >
> > Could be just..
> >
> > $ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
> > $ cd linux-2.6
> > $ git pull
>
> That is not actually the same. "git pull" for example will not download
> Linus' tags whilst the rsync would get everything.
Ah. I didn't know this. Thanks.
Hmm, it'd be nice to have a shorthand 'not have to type the url, pull everything'.
Something like 'git pull all'.
Dave
From: Jeff Garzik <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 20:15:49
Dave Jones wrote:
You wrote..
$ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ rsync -a --verbose --stats --progress \
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/ \
.git/
Could be just..
$ git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ git pull
Likewise, in the next section, git pull doesn't need an argument
if pulling from the repo it cloned.
Nope. It intentionally includes the manual rsync because clone/pull
doesn't seem to grab tags. Or at least last time I checked...
Jeff
From: Chuck Lever <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 21:23:07
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
quoted
You wrote..
$ git clone
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ rsync -a --verbose --stats --progress \
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/
\
.git/
Could be just..
$ git clone
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6
$ git pull
Likewise, in the next section, git pull doesn't need an argument
if pulling from the repo it cloned.
Nope. It intentionally includes the manual rsync because clone/pull
doesn't seem to grab tags. Or at least last time I checked...
i just used the instructions at the bottom of your web page to grab new
tags, and it completely wiped all my Stacked Git metadata. (fortunately
i was trying this in a test repository, and it will be simple to recover
the missing files).
so, this is probably something that should have a warning, or maybe you
might consider providing an example that won't wipe out existing files
and directories under .git/ ...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:26:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >Something like this?
>
> Gaah. Using a new pine version, and it is back to corrupting whitespace.
>
> Damn all mailer writers. Do they think email is just for grandma?
Of course - grandma uses pine, hackers use mutt ;)
*hides*
Best,
Elfyn
--
Elfyn McBratney
Gentoo Developer/Perl Team Lead
beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/
+------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc
PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD
PGP Key Fingerprint:
DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD
From: Dave Jones <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 21:33:36
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:26:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >Something like this?
>
> Gaah. Using a new pine version, and it is back to corrupting whitespace.
>
> Damn all mailer writers. Do they think email is just for grandma?
What I find amusing is that it was a patch rejection mail from you
*years* back (circa 2000 iirc), telling me my pine corrupted whitespace,
that made me switch MUA ;-)
All these years later, and it's still buggered ?
Dave
Gaah. Using a new pine version, and it is back to corrupting whitespace.
Ok, disabling "text flowing" seems to have fixed it. It still leaves empty
spaces at the end of lines when doing normal word-wrapping in the editor
(and then seems to use those empty spaces as a "marker" for flowing), but
that's at least just a small silly detail.
So how about this patch now? With it you can do
git fetch --tags <linus-kernel-repo>
and it should fetch all my tags automatically.
Linus
---
From: Dave Jones <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 21:40:54
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:35:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Gaah. Using a new pine version, and it is back to corrupting whitespace.
>
> Ok, disabling "text flowing" seems to have fixed it. It still leaves empty
> spaces at the end of lines when doing normal word-wrapping in the editor
> (and then seems to use those empty spaces as a "marker" for flowing), but
> that's at least just a small silly detail.
>
> So how about this patch now? With it you can do
>
> git fetch --tags <linus-kernel-repo>
>
> and it should fetch all my tags automatically.
Seems to work. I blew away git/refs/tags/v2.6.13*
and git fetch --tags fetched them all back just fine.
Dave
What I find amusing is that it was a patch rejection mail from you
*years* back (circa 2000 iirc), telling me my pine corrupted whitespace,
that made me switch MUA ;-)
All these years later, and it's still buggered ?
Actually, it seems better. It seems to be buggered by default, but it used
to be that you had to actually recompile pine to make it behave. Now you
can just disable "strip-whitespace-before-send" and _enable_
"quell-flowed-text" and those together seem to do the trick. No extra
patches or recompiles necessary.
So there's progress.
Of course, pico is still pico. Which I find a bit sad: my editor of choise
is still an improved version of uemacs, and pico actually comes from the
same uemacs history, but has different key-bindings for just enough keys
to be slightly confusing.
Still, that shared history means that I find pico a lot more to my taste
than just about any other emailer editor out there. It may have a few
differences, but it has more things in common..
Linus
From: Anton Altaparmakov <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 22:12:49
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Dave Jones wrote:
quoted
What I find amusing is that it was a patch rejection mail from you
*years* back (circa 2000 iirc), telling me my pine corrupted whitespace,
that made me switch MUA ;-)
All these years later, and it's still buggered ?
Actually, it seems better. It seems to be buggered by default, but it used
to be that you had to actually recompile pine to make it behave. Now you
can just disable "strip-whitespace-before-send" and _enable_
"quell-flowed-text" and those together seem to do the trick. No extra
patches or recompiles necessary.
Indeed. I use those two options like that, too. (-:
So there's progress.
Of course, pico is still pico. Which I find a bit sad: my editor of choise
is still an improved version of uemacs, and pico actually comes from the
same uemacs history, but has different key-bindings for just enough keys
to be slightly confusing.
Still, that shared history means that I find pico a lot more to my taste
than just about any other emailer editor out there. It may have a few
differences, but it has more things in common..
Why don't you enable "enable-alternate-editor-implicitly" and set
editor = "your-editor-of-choice" in the pine config? It is integrated in
a quite seamless way.
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
Why don't you enable "enable-alternate-editor-implicitly" and set
editor = "your-editor-of-choice" in the pine config? It is integrated in
a quite seamless way.
You think so? I don't find it that way.
With an alternate editor you have to edit the headers separately, and
things like postponing a message suddenly turns into a big deal, not just
a trivial ^O. In fact, almost everything gets more involved.
And pico _is_ pretty close to uemacs.
Linus
From: Anton Altaparmakov <hidden> Date: 2005-09-29 22:33:08
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
quoted
Why don't you enable "enable-alternate-editor-implicitly" and set
editor = "your-editor-of-choice" in the pine config? It is integrated in
a quite seamless way.
You think so? I don't find it that way.
With an alternate editor you have to edit the headers separately, and
things like postponing a message suddenly turns into a big deal, not just
a trivial ^O. In fact, almost everything gets more involved.
Well using vim as alternate editor a postpone turns into a "ZZ" followed
by ^O which I don't think is such a big deal but in general I agree that
it adds hassle. It is a shame that the text based headers do not appear
as part of the message in the editor in particular...
And pico _is_ pretty close to uemacs.
I wouldn't know about that. Never used uemacs. I am a vim addict myself.
(-;
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/