[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bpf: fix spelling in comments
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: 2021-09-09 15:02:25
Subsystem:
library code, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
Found by running codespell on the bpf implementation. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> --- lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c | 2 +- lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
index aa22ea78a01d..518513376a67 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ emit_epilog(struct bpf_jit_state *st) uint32_t i; int32_t spil, ofs; - /* if we allready have an epilog generate a jump to it */ + /* if we already have an epilog generate a jump to it */ if (st->exit.num++ != 0) { emit_abs_jmp(st, st->exit.off); return;
diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
index 7b1291b382e9..3e7d3d730637 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static const struct bpf_ins_check ins_chk[UINT8_MAX + 1] = { /* * make sure that instruction syntax is valid, - * and it fields don't violate partciular instrcution type restrictions. + * and it fields don't violate particular instruction type restrictions. */ static const char * check_syntax(const struct ebpf_insn *ins)
@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ validate(struct bpf_verifier *bvf) /* * construct CFG, jcc nodes have to outgoing edges, - * 'exit' nodes - none, all others nodes have exaclty one + * 'exit' nodes - none, all others nodes have exactly one * outgoing edge. */ switch (ins->code) {
--
2.30.2