Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx build only on 64-bit Linux

From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-21 14:07:47

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:52 PM Thomas Monjalon
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This is a reorg of the patches from Pavan.
It has been discussed that it should wait for DPDK 21.11
for ABI compatibility reason.

Pavan Nikhilesh (3):
  net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
  common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
  common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux

 drivers/common/octeontx/meson.build   |  6 ++++++
 drivers/common/octeontx2/meson.build  |  4 ++--
 drivers/compress/octeontx/meson.build |  6 ++++++
 drivers/crypto/octeontx/meson.build   |  7 +++++--
 drivers/event/octeontx/meson.build    |  6 ++++++
 drivers/event/octeontx2/meson.build   |  4 ++--
 drivers/mempool/octeontx/meson.build  |  5 +++--
 drivers/mempool/octeontx2/meson.build |  9 ++-------
 drivers/net/octeontx/meson.build      |  4 ++--
 drivers/net/octeontx2/meson.build     | 10 ++--------
 drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build      |  4 ++--
 drivers/raw/octeontx2_dma/meson.build | 10 ++++++----
 12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
There were a couple of cleanups (indent etc..) and changes in meson
files.
This series does not apply cleanly on the main branch.
Could you rebase it?
Ack l will rebase it.
I noticed that the net/cnxk driver does not have this check, but it is
disabled anyway since it depends on common/cnxk.
Is it worth adding the check for consistency?
Sure I will add checks to cnxk driver family.

Thanks,
Pavan.

--
David Marchand
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help