Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx build only on 64-bit Linux
From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-21 14:07:47
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:52 PM Thomas Monjalon [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This is a reorg of the patches from Pavan. It has been discussed that it should wait for DPDK 21.11 for ABI compatibility reason. Pavan Nikhilesh (3): net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux drivers/common/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ drivers/common/octeontx2/meson.build | 4 ++-- drivers/compress/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ drivers/crypto/octeontx/meson.build | 7 +++++-- drivers/event/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ drivers/event/octeontx2/meson.build | 4 ++-- drivers/mempool/octeontx/meson.build | 5 +++-- drivers/mempool/octeontx2/meson.build | 9 ++------- drivers/net/octeontx/meson.build | 4 ++-- drivers/net/octeontx2/meson.build | 10 ++-------- drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- drivers/raw/octeontx2_dma/meson.build | 10 ++++++---- 12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)There were a couple of cleanups (indent etc..) and changes in meson files. This series does not apply cleanly on the main branch. Could you rebase it?
Ack l will rebase it.
I noticed that the net/cnxk driver does not have this check, but it is disabled anyway since it depends on common/cnxk. Is it worth adding the check for consistency?
Sure I will add checks to cnxk driver family. Thanks, Pavan.
-- David Marchand