dpdk-dev archive · February 2014

177 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 02/11] devices-args: introduce rte_devargs in eal
  2014-02-28 21:39 · 0 replies this month · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 11/11] testpmd: add several dump commands, useful for debug
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 10/11] device-args: allow to provide per pci device command line arguments
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 09/11] device-args: replace use-device eal option by pci-whitelist and vdev
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 08/11] device-args: use a comma instead of semicolon to separate key/values
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 07/11] vdev: allow external registration of virtual device drivers
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 06/11] vdev: rename eal_common_nonpci_devs.c as eal_common_vdev.c
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 05/11] pci: rename device_list as pci_device_list
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 04/11] devices-args: add a dump_devargs command in basic test application
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 03/11] devices-args: use rte_devargs and remove old whitelist code
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 02/11] devices-args: introduce rte_devargs in eal
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 01/11] mk: use whole-archive option when creating dpdk binaries
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 00/11] eal: allow virtual pmd drivers as shared lib
  2014-02-28 17:25 · 0 replies this month · Olivier Matz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Error building using 1.6.0r1
  2014-02-28 10:20 · 0 replies this month · Mats Liljegren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Error building using 1.6.0r1
  2014-02-28 08:47 · 0 replies this month · Mats Liljegren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 2/2] mem: fix build on 32bits system
  2014-02-28 08:21 · 0 replies this month · David Marchand <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/2] eal: fix use of RTE_PTR_ALIGN_CEIL macro on 32bits system
  2014-02-28 08:21 · 0 replies this month · David Marchand <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Error building using 1.6.0r1
  2014-02-28 08:11 · 0 replies this month · David Marchand <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to get symmetric hash from RSS for a given flow
  2014-02-28 05:34 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Kan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to get symmetric hash from RSS for a given flow
  2014-02-28 01:08 · 0 replies this month · Stefan Baranoff <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to get symmetric hash from RSS for a given flow
  2014-02-28 01:04 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Kan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to get symmetric hash from RSS for a given flow
  2014-02-28 00:24 · 0 replies this month · Sangjin Han <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Is it possible to get symmetric hash from RSS for a given flow
  2014-02-28 00:22 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Kan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1.6.1] don't inline rte_string_fns
  2014-02-27 17:18 · 0 replies this month · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Issues with multiple DPDK instances
  2014-02-27 14:30 · 0 replies this month · Mats Liljegren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Error building using 1.6.0r1
  2014-02-27 14:08 · 0 replies this month · Mats Liljegren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [dpdk-announce] DPDK 1.6.0r1 released
  2014-02-27 10:10 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: l2fwd/l3fwd performance drop of about 25% ?
  2014-02-27 09:36 · 0 replies this month · Richardson, Bruce <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM
  2014-02-26 16:19 · 0 replies this month · Chris Wright <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [vmxnet3-usermap PATCH 07/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM
  2014-02-26 13:22 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Graf <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM
  2014-02-26 13:07 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Graf <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Unusable interfaces although apparently attached to IGB_UIO
  2014-02-26 13:03 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-26 10:52 · 0 replies this month · didier.pallard <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [dpdk-announce] DPDK 1.5.2r2 released
  2014-02-26 10:33 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH v3] timer: add new rte_rdtsc_precise function
  2014-02-26 09:39 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: RTE CRC hash function
  2014-02-26 09:07 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• STALE4514d Re: [PATCH] mk: pass CROSS_COMPILE when compiling kernel modules
  2014-02-25 21:55 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies l2fwd/l3fwd performance drop of about 25% ?
  2014-02-25 21:01 · 0 replies this month · Jun Han <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Unusable interfaces although apparently attached to IGB_UIO
  2014-02-25 13:36 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Unusable interfaces although apparently attached to IGB_UIO
  2014-02-25 13:27 · 0 replies this month · Marc Sune <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Unusable interfaces although apparently attached to IGB_UIO
  2014-02-25 13:00 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Unusable interfaces although apparently attached to IGB_UIO
  2014-02-25 12:20 · 0 replies this month · Marc Sune <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] hash: reverse the operand order to crc32 in rte_hash_crc.h
  2014-02-25 10:57 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] hash: reverse the operand order to crc32 in rte_hash_crc.h
  2014-02-25 10:07 · 0 replies this month · H. Peter Anvin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies DPDK on Xen Server
  2014-02-25 01:44 · 0 replies this month · machi1271 <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-25 00:57 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies l3fwd increasing LPM IPv4 Table Size
  2014-02-24 20:01 · 0 replies this month · Jun Han <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [vmxnet3-usermap PATCH 04/16] pmd: add make help
  2014-02-24 18:17 · 0 replies this month · Chris Wright <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [vmxnet3-usermap PATCH 05/16] pmd: allow to build outside of the source directory
  2014-02-24 18:13 · 0 replies this month · Chris Wright <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM
  2014-02-24 16:52 · 0 replies this month · Chris Wright <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM
  2014-02-24 16:29 · 0 replies this month · Chris Wright <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH 02/16] virtio: rename library
  2014-02-24 16:05 · 0 replies this month · Chris Wright <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH 01/16] tools: rename pci_unbind script
  2014-02-24 16:03 · 0 replies this month · Chris Wright <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-24 15:34 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-24 14:19 · 0 replies this month · didier.pallard <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: using dpdk without glibc
  2014-02-24 06:11 · 0 replies this month · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: What's the performance significance of ixgbe_recv_pkts_bulk_alloc
  2014-02-23 23:57 · 0 replies this month · Jayakumar, Muthurajan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies What's the performance significance of ixgbe_recv_pkts_bulk_alloc
  2014-02-23 23:43 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Kan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: using dpdk without glibc
  2014-02-23 20:33 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies using dpdk without glibc
  2014-02-23 17:48 · 0 replies this month · Nulik Nol <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-21 16:30 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-19 17:51 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: problem with rte_pktmbuf_prepend (possible bug?)
  2014-02-19 17:32 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-19 16:52 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH v3] timer: add new rte_rdtsc_precise function
  2014-02-19 16:46 · 0 replies this month · Didier Pallard <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: problem with rte_pktmbuf_prepend (possible bug?)
  2014-02-19 14:04 · 0 replies this month · Mario Gianni <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-19 12:41 · 0 replies this month · Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-19 11:59 · 0 replies this month · Didier Pallard <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC PATCH 1/2] e1000: release software locked semaphores on initialization
  2014-02-19 11:59 · 0 replies this month · Didier Pallard <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH v2] timer: add lfence before TSC read
  2014-02-19 11:39 · 0 replies this month · Didier Pallard <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies ethtool not supported intel 82574 chip, has any plan?
  2014-02-19 03:49 · 0 replies this month · 范敦球 <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: problem with rte_pktmbuf_prepend (possible bug?)
  2014-02-18 17:16 · 0 replies this month · Benson, Bryan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: problem with rte_pktmbuf_prepend (possible bug?)
  2014-02-18 14:19 · 0 replies this month · Periklis Akritidis <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: rte_eal_init independent from main(int argc, char** argv)
  2014-02-18 13:52 · 0 replies this month · Periklis Akritidis <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Receive queue full
  2014-02-18 13:14 · 0 replies this month · François-Frédéric Ozog <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: rte_eal_init independent from main(int argc, char** argv)
  2014-02-18 12:57 · 0 replies this month · Hamid Ramazani <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies rte_eal_init independent from main(int argc, char** argv)
  2014-02-18 12:54 · 0 replies this month · Hamid Ramazani <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Question on DPDK multi-process support
  2014-02-18 12:53 · 0 replies this month · Richardson, Bruce <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Question on DPDK multi-process support
  2014-02-18 12:45 · 0 replies this month · Mauro Annarumma <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies problem with rte_pktmbuf_prepend (possible bug?)
  2014-02-18 10:27 · 0 replies this month · Mario Gianni <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-17 17:52 · 0 replies this month · Venkatesan, Venky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Question on DPDK multi-process support
  2014-02-17 16:44 · 0 replies this month · Richardson, Bruce <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-17 16:41 · 0 replies this month · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Question on DPDK multi-process support
  2014-02-17 15:48 · 0 replies this month · Mauro Annarumma <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: How to debug packet sends to virtual functions
  2014-02-17 14:36 · 0 replies this month · Burakov, Anatoly <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: How to debug packet sends to virtual functions
  2014-02-17 14:35 · 0 replies this month · Mats Liljegren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-17 12:49 · 0 replies this month · jigsaw <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: How to debug packet sends to virtual functions
  2014-02-17 12:29 · 0 replies this month · Mats Liljegren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: How to debug packet sends to virtual functions
  2014-02-17 12:11 · 0 replies this month · Burakov, Anatoly <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: How to debug packet sends to virtual functions
  2014-02-17 11:05 · 0 replies this month · Mats Liljegren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies turn on optical bypass
  2014-02-17 09:15 · 0 replies this month · Sharath <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-16 19:02 · 0 replies this month · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-14 20:11 · 0 replies this month · Ymo Lists <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-14 18:20 · 0 replies this month · Jayakumar, Muthurajan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-14 17:20 · 0 replies this month · Ymo Lists <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: DPDK not recognizing 82599 on my setup
  2014-02-14 11:38 · 0 replies this month · Prashant Upadhyaya <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
  2014-02-14 10:28 · 0 replies this month · Mauro Annarumma <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: DPDK not recognizing 82599 on my setup
  2014-02-14 09:41 · 0 replies this month · jigsaw <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: DPDK not recognizing 82599 on my setup
  2014-02-14 09:30 · 0 replies this month · Prashant Upadhyaya <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ?
  2014-02-14 08:42 · 0 replies this month · Vivek Soni <hidden>