RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
From: Loktionov, Aleksandr <hidden>
Date: 2026-03-11 08:18:06
Also in:
amd-gfx, bpf, ceph-devel, cocci, dri-devel, gfs2, intel-gfx, intel-wired-lan, kvm, linux-block, linux-bluetooth, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-clk, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-gpio, linux-hyperv, linux-input, linux-iommu, linux-leds, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-modules, linux-nfs, linux-omap, linux-phy, linux-pm, linux-rockchip, linux-s390, linux-scsi, linux-sctp, linux-security-module, linux-sh, linux-sound, linux-trace-kernel, linux-usb, linux-wireless, lkml, netdev, ntfs3, sched-ext, target-devel, v9fs
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Intel-wired-lan <redacted> On Behalf Of Philipp Hahn Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 12:49 PM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com; bpf@vger.kernel.org; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; cocci@inria.fr; dm- devel@lists.linux.dev; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; gfs2@lists.linux.dev; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-wired- lan@lists.osuosl.org; iommu@lists.linux.dev; kvm@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; linux- cifs@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux- erofs@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux- fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; linux- hyperv@vger.kernel.org; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-leds@vger.kernel.org; linux- media@vger.kernel.org; linux-mips@vger.kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-modules@vger.kernel.org; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux- nfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux- phy@lists.infradead.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux- rockchip@lists.infradead.org; linux-s390@vger.kernel.org; linux- scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org; linux-security- module@vger.kernel.org; linux-sh@vger.kernel.org; linux- sound@vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com; linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux- wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; ntfs3@lists.linux.dev; samba-technical@lists.samba.org; sched- ext@lists.linux.dev; target-devel@vger.kernel.org; tipc- discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; v9fs@lists.linux.dev; Philipp Hahn [off-list ref] Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>; Latchesar Ionkov [off-list ref]; Dominique Martinet [off-list ref]; Christian Schoenebeck [off-list ref] Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL check. Change generated with coccinelle. To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org> To: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net> To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com> Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <redacted> --- fs/9p/fid.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/fs/9p/fid.h b/fs/9p/fid.hindex 0d6138bee2a3d1ab565ab2d210c0a3f3bf97e4e3..3bb7ef4380e972a2d9ab67eb4aab 6cc5bfe2eea7 100644--- a/fs/9p/fid.h +++ b/fs/9p/fid.h@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_clone(structdentry *dentry) struct p9_fid *fid, *nfid; fid = v9fs_fid_lookup(dentry); - if (!fid || IS_ERR(fid)) + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fid)) return fid; nfid = clone_fid(fid); -- 2.43.0
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <redacted>