[PATCH] hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup refcounting during vma split

Subsystems: hugetlb subsystem, memory management, the rest

STALE1836d

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-31 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup refcounting during vma split

From: Mike Kravetz <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-30 21:50:50

Guillaume Morin reported hitting the following WARNING followed
by GPF or NULL pointer deference either in cgroups_destroy or in
the kill_css path.:

percpu ref (css_release) <= 0 (-1) after switching to atomic
WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 130 at lib/percpu-refcount.c:196 percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130
CPU: 23 PID: 130 Comm: ksoftirqd/23 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G           O      5.10.60 #1
RIP: 0010:percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130
Call Trace:
 rcu_core+0x30f/0x530
 rcu_core_si+0xe/0x10
 __do_softirq+0x103/0x2a2
 ? sort_range+0x30/0x30
 run_ksoftirqd+0x2b/0x40
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x11a/0x170
 kthread+0x10a/0x140
 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Upon further examination, it was discovered that the css structure
was associated with hugetlb reservations.

For private hugetlb mappings the vma points to a reserve map that
contains a pointer to the css.  At mmap time, reservations are set up
and a reference to the css is taken.  This reference is dropped in the
vma close operation; hugetlb_vm_op_close.  However, if a vma is split
no additional reference to the css is taken yet hugetlb_vm_op_close will
be called twice for the split vma resulting in an underflow.

Fix by taking another reference in hugetlb_vm_op_open.  Note that the
reference is only taken for the owner of the reserve map.  In the more
common fork case, the pointer to the reserve map is cleared for
non-owning vmas.

Fixes: e9fe92ae0cd2 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for
private mappings")
Reported-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume-/FyPzM6KSZdAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Suggested-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume-/FyPzM6KSZdAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
---
 include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 mm/hugetlb.c                   |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
index 0b8d1fdda3a1..c137396129db 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
@@ -121,6 +121,13 @@ static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_put_rsvd_cgroup(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
 	css_put(&h_cg->css);
 }
 
+static inline void resv_map_dup_hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_info(
+						struct resv_map *resv_map)
+{
+	if (resv_map->css)
+		css_get(resv_map->css);
+}
+
 extern int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
 					struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr);
 extern int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
@@ -199,6 +206,11 @@ static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_put_rsvd_cgroup(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
 {
 }
 
+static inline void resv_map_dup_hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_info(
+						struct resv_map *resv_map)
+{
+}
+
 static inline int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
 					       struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr)
 {
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 8ea35ba6699f..6c583ef079e3 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4033,8 +4033,10 @@ static void hugetlb_vm_op_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	 * after this open call completes.  It is therefore safe to take a
 	 * new reference here without additional locking.
 	 */
-	if (resv && is_vma_resv_set(vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
+	if (resv && is_vma_resv_set(vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER)) {
+		resv_map_dup_hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_info(resv);
 		kref_get(&resv->refs);
+	}
 }
 
 static void hugetlb_vm_op_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup refcounting during vma split

From: Guillaume Morin <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-31 14:02:24

On 30 Aug 14:50, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Guillaume Morin reported hitting the following WARNING followed
by GPF or NULL pointer deference either in cgroups_destroy or in
the kill_css path.:

percpu ref (css_release) <= 0 (-1) after switching to atomic
WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 130 at lib/percpu-refcount.c:196 percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130
CPU: 23 PID: 130 Comm: ksoftirqd/23 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G           O      5.10.60 #1
RIP: 0010:percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130
Call Trace:
 rcu_core+0x30f/0x530
 rcu_core_si+0xe/0x10
 __do_softirq+0x103/0x2a2
 ? sort_range+0x30/0x30
 run_ksoftirqd+0x2b/0x40
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x11a/0x170
 kthread+0x10a/0x140
 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Upon further examination, it was discovered that the css structure
was associated with hugetlb reservations.

For private hugetlb mappings the vma points to a reserve map that
contains a pointer to the css.  At mmap time, reservations are set up
and a reference to the css is taken.  This reference is dropped in the
vma close operation; hugetlb_vm_op_close.  However, if a vma is split
no additional reference to the css is taken yet hugetlb_vm_op_close will
be called twice for the split vma resulting in an underflow.

Fix by taking another reference in hugetlb_vm_op_open.  Note that the
reference is only taken for the owner of the reserve map.  In the more
common fork case, the pointer to the reserve map is cleared for
non-owning vmas.

Fixes: e9fe92ae0cd2 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for
private mappings")
Reported-by: Guillaume Morin <redacted>
Suggested-by: Guillaume Morin <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
I verified that the patch does fix the underflow. I appreciate the help!

Feel free to add:
Tested-by: Guillaume Morin <redacted>

-- 
Guillaume Morin [off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help