Summary:
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also adds an atomic boolean to prevent logging too much (e.g. a fork
bomb). The message is logged once per cgroup until the next time the pids limit
changes.
Signed-off-by: Kenny Yu <redacted>
---
kernel/cgroup_pids.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -49,6 +49,18 @@ struct pids_cgroup {*/atomic64_tcounter;int64_tlimit;++/* Handle for "pids.events" */+structcgroup_fileevents_file;++/* Number of times fork failed because limit was hit. */+atomic64_tevents_limit;++/*+*Toavoidloggingtoomuch(e.g.duringaforkbomb),logonlyonce+*percgroupandresetthiswhenthelimitchanges.+*/+atomic_tevents_limit_logged;};staticstructpids_cgroup*css_pids(structcgroup_subsys_state*css)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Date: 2016-06-21 04:45:28
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:09:22PM -0700, Kenny Yu wrote:
Summary:
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also adds an atomic boolean to prevent logging too much (e.g. a fork
bomb). The message is logged once per cgroup until the next time the pids limit
changes.
Signed-off-by: Kenny Yu <redacted>
This makes sense to me. Hitting the cgroup PID limit right now is
somewhat ominous. A little more visibility would help.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
One comment below, but mostly a matter of preference:
quoted hunk
@@ -205,6 +219,17 @@ static void pids_cancel_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset) } }+static void pids_fork_failed_event(struct pids_cgroup *pids)+{+ atomic64_inc(&pids->events_limit);+ cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);+ if (!atomic_xchg(&pids->events_limit_logged, 1)) {+ pr_info("cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in ");+ pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(current, pids_cgrp_id));+ pr_cont("\n");+ }+}+ /* * task_css_check(true) in pids_can_fork() and pids_cancel_fork() relies * on threadgroup_change_begin() held by the copy_process().
@@ -213,10 +227,21 @@ static int pids_can_fork(struct task_struct *task) { struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; struct pids_cgroup *pids;+ int err; css = task_css_check(current, pids_cgrp_id, true); pids = css_pids(css);- return pids_try_charge(pids, 1);+ err = pids_try_charge(pids, 1);+ if (err) {+ atomic64_inc(&pids->events_limit);+ cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);+ if (!atomic_xchg(&pids->events_limit_logged, 1)) {+ pr_info("cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in ");+ pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(current, pids_cgrp_id));+ pr_cont("\n");+ }+ }+ return err; }
Why are we logging this? Isn't the pids.events file enough
information? I feel like you could remove a lot of logic if you don't
log this.
And even if we do end up logging it, why have the boolean flag (the
counter always increases, just log if the counter is currently 0 and
you're incrementing it).
--
Aleksa Sarai (cyphar)
www.cyphar.com
Summary:
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also adds an atomic boolean to prevent logging too much (e.g. a fork
bomb). The message is logged once per cgroup until the next time the pids limit
changes.
Signed-off-by: Kenny Yu <redacted>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes <at> cmpxchg.org>
---
kernel/cgroup_pids.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -49,6 +49,18 @@ struct pids_cgroup {*/atomic64_tcounter;int64_tlimit;++/* Handle for "pids.events" */+structcgroup_fileevents_file;++/* Number of times fork failed because limit was hit. */+atomic64_tevents_limit;++/*+*Toavoidloggingtoomuch(e.g.duringaforkbomb),logonlyonce+*percgroupandresetthiswhenthelimitchanges.+*/+atomic_tevents_limit_logged;};staticstructpids_cgroup*css_pids(structcgroup_subsys_state*css)
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 02:07:09AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
Why are we logging this? Isn't the pids.events file enough
information? I feel like you could remove a lot of logic if you don't
log this.
I think logging it is a good idea. People aren't used to think about
the pids controller when fork fails and I've seen people getting
royally confused by it. Also, if fork is being rejected on the right
(or wrong) cgroup, investigating why that's happening can be extremely
challenging (e.g. can't login).
And even if we do end up logging it, why have the boolean flag (the
counter always increases, just log if the counter is currently 0 and
you're incrementing it).
Ah, that's true. I like the fact that the warning message will be
printed after each change to the limit but yeah going off of zero
events_limit count should be fine too.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Summary:
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also adds an atomic boolean to prevent logging too much (e.g. a fork
bomb). The message is logged once per cgroup until the next time the pids limit
changes.
Signed-off-by: Kenny Yu <redacted>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes <at> cmpxchg.org>
---
kernel/cgroup_pids.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ struct pids_cgroup {*/atomic64_tcounter;int64_tlimit;++/* Handle for "pids.events" */+structcgroup_fileevents_file;++/* Number of times fork failed because limit was hit. */+atomic64_tevents_limit;};staticstructpids_cgroup*css_pids(structcgroup_subsys_state*css)
@@ -213,10 +220,23 @@ static int pids_can_fork(struct task_struct *task){structcgroup_subsys_state*css;structpids_cgroup*pids;+interr;+intevents_limit;css=task_css_check(current,pids_cgrp_id,true);pids=css_pids(css);-returnpids_try_charge(pids,1);+err=pids_try_charge(pids,1);+if(err){+events_limit=atomic64_inc_return(&pids->events_limit);+cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);+/* Only log the first time events_limit is incremented. */+if(events_limit==1){+pr_info("cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in ");+pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(current,pids_cgrp_id));+pr_cont("\n");+}+}+returnerr;}staticvoidpids_cancel_fork(structtask_struct*task)
Hello,
Just a couple nits.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:56:38AM -0700, Kenny Yu wrote:
Summary:
No need for "Summary:" tag.
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also adds an atomic boolean to prevent logging too much (e.g. a fork
bomb). The message is logged once per cgroup until the next time the pids limit
changes.
The above paragraph isn't uptodate anymore.
quoted hunk
@@ -213,10 +220,23 @@ static int pids_can_fork(struct task_struct *task) { struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; struct pids_cgroup *pids;+ int err;+ int events_limit; css = task_css_check(current, pids_cgrp_id, true); pids = css_pids(css);- return pids_try_charge(pids, 1);+ err = pids_try_charge(pids, 1);+ if (err) {+ events_limit = atomic64_inc_return(&pids->events_limit);+ cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);+ /* Only log the first time events_limit is incremented. */+ if (events_limit == 1) {+ pr_info("cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in ");+ pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(current, pids_cgrp_id));+ pr_cont("\n");+ }+ }+ return err; }
It'd be better to use atomic64_inc_and_test() instead.
if (err) {
if (atomic64_inc_and_test()) {
pr_xxx...;
}
cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);
}
Thanks.
--
tejun
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:44:50AM -0700, Kenny Yu wrote:
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also logs only the first time the `max` event counter is
incremented. This is to provide a hint to the user to understand why fork
failed, as users are not yet used to seeing fork failures because of the
pids controller.
Signed-off-by: Kenny Yu <redacted>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes <at> cmpxchg.org>
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:23:40PM +0000, Kenny Yu wrote:
quoted
It'd be better to use atomic64_inc_and_test() instead.
if (err) {
if (atomic64_inc_and_test()) {
pr_xxx...;
}
cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);
}
According to the docs https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt ,
it looks like atomic_inc_and_test returns "a boolean indicating whether the resulting
counter value was zero or not", which will only happen when the counter goes from
negative to 0. I'll keep it as atomic_inc_return and get rid of the temp variable.
Right you're. Sorry about the confusion. Yeah, that sounds good to
me.
Thanks!
--
tejun
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also logs only the first time the `max` event counter is
incremented. This is to provide a hint to the user to understand why fork
failed, as users are not yet used to seeing fork failures because of the
pids controller.
Signed-off-by: Kenny Yu <redacted>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes <at> cmpxchg.org>
---
kernel/cgroup_pids.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ struct pids_cgroup {*/atomic64_tcounter;int64_tlimit;++/* Handle for "pids.events" */+structcgroup_fileevents_file;++/* Number of times fork failed because limit was hit. */+atomic64_tevents_limit;};staticstructpids_cgroup*css_pids(structcgroup_subsys_state*css)
@@ -213,10 +220,21 @@ static int pids_can_fork(struct task_struct *task){structcgroup_subsys_state*css;structpids_cgroup*pids;+interr;css=task_css_check(current,pids_cgrp_id,true);pids=css_pids(css);-returnpids_try_charge(pids,1);+err=pids_try_charge(pids,1);+if(err){+/* Only log the first time events_limit is incremented. */+if(atomic64_inc_return(&pids->events_limit)==1){+pr_info("cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in ");+pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(current,pids_cgrp_id));+pr_cont("\n");+}+cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);+}+returnerr;}staticvoidpids_cancel_fork(structtask_struct*task)
Thanks for the feedback Tejun!
On 6/21/16, 1:12 PM, "Tejun Heo" <htejun@gmail.com on behalf of tj@kernel.org> wrote:
Hello,
Just a couple nits.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:56:38AM -0700, Kenny Yu wrote:
quoted
Summary:
No need for "Summary:" tag.
quoted
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the events file represents
the number of times fork failed because of the pids controller.
This change also adds an atomic boolean to prevent logging too much (e.g. a fork
bomb). The message is logged once per cgroup until the next time the pids limit
changes.
The above paragraph isn't uptodate anymore.
Thanks! Will change.
quoted
@@ -213,10 +220,23 @@ static int pids_can_fork(struct task_struct *task) { struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; struct pids_cgroup *pids;+ int err;+ int events_limit; css = task_css_check(current, pids_cgrp_id, true); pids = css_pids(css);- return pids_try_charge(pids, 1);+ err = pids_try_charge(pids, 1);+ if (err) {+ events_limit = atomic64_inc_return(&pids->events_limit);+ cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);+ /* Only log the first time events_limit is incremented. */+ if (events_limit == 1) {+ pr_info("cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in ");+ pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(current, pids_cgrp_id));+ pr_cont("\n");+ }+ }+ return err; }
It'd be better to use atomic64_inc_and_test() instead.
if (err) {
if (atomic64_inc_and_test()) {
pr_xxx...;
}
cgroup_file_notify(&pids->events_file);
}
According to the docs https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt ,
it looks like atomic_inc_and_test returns "a boolean indicating whether the resulting
counter value was zero or not", which will only happen when the counter goes from
negative to 0. I'll keep it as atomic_inc_return and get rid of the temp variable.